|
Post by Ron Howard on Mar 21, 2008 0:07:22 GMT -5
I believe it is part of silkscreen printing, but you can print "gradients" but its pretty expensive. I talked to Carney about doing it before and he said he could be done but its a different process.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Mar 21, 2008 14:46:58 GMT -5
and not all printing on tshirts are on press's like at our school, on the new machine we can.. they dont really call it gradient print but they use the term "spot" printing i think. Do you think a small band could afford to pay for a bunch of shirts done like that? I think not.
|
|
rikemice
A little Closer.....
Posts: 152
|
Post by rikemice on Mar 21, 2008 16:31:27 GMT -5
well we never talked about how much it was or even if they could afford it silly.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Mar 25, 2008 21:51:16 GMT -5
Sorry
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Aug 5, 2008 0:09:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Matt Radick on Aug 7, 2008 8:33:01 GMT -5
You da man. I like the pool one a lot.
|
|
rikemice
A little Closer.....
Posts: 152
|
Post by rikemice on Aug 7, 2008 23:04:10 GMT -5
OMG JASON FROM CHIODOS!: oh and duke:
|
|
|
Post by lancenelson on Sept 9, 2008 15:22:42 GMT -5
|
|
zak
A little Closer.....
Posts: 136
|
Post by zak on Nov 12, 2008 21:47:23 GMT -5
I believe it is part of silkscreen printing, but you can print "gradients" but its pretty expensive. I talked to Carney about doing it before and he said he could be done but its a different process. you'd do it like how you'd do any other gradient, youd take that image of the words and convert it to halftones and make a screen of that. anyone should be able to do it, you just use photo shop and convert the file to a halftone bitmap.or something. this is really hard to explain on the internet. ill use this dog picture to explain what i mean.
|
|
|
Post by Cody Davis on Dec 8, 2008 12:39:35 GMT -5
Quick question for all you photo junkies! I seem lately to have trouble in the opera house no matter what camera I use with my exposure and all. As stupid as it sounds.. What Fstop and Shutter Speed do you guys typiclly use for the opera house?
|
|
|
Post by Ron Howard on Dec 8, 2008 14:56:34 GMT -5
Quick question for all you photo junkies! I seem lately to have trouble in the opera house no matter what camera I use with my exposure and all. As stupid as it sounds.. What Fstop and Shutter Speed do you guys typiclly use for the opera house? Really it depends on the lighting during the situation. The opera house tends to have different lighting all the time. When shooting concerts, its usually best to have the lowest fstop possible while maintaining the fastest shutter speed you can without the image getting too dark. Depending on the camera you are using you might also want to boost your ISO up to something like 1600, although it will make your image grainy it allow for a better image in low light. When shooting almost any concert I love shooting with a 50mm f1.8 lens (a cheap lens for pretty much any setup) at ISO1600 or lower if possible. Hope that helps.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Dec 8, 2008 16:11:44 GMT -5
At the opera house, I run at like f22 with a 1/4000 shutter, some tell me that it's just a black image, but I call it art. Most of my pieces are called "None More Black".
But seriously, just use a flash, run your f-stop as low was you can. Like Ron said, keep that ISO down as much as you can or you'll get grainy garbage. If you have a pretty solid and steady grip, trying slowing up that shutter speed to like 1/24 or maybe a second or so, you'll snatch up a lot more light.
|
|
|
Post by lancenelson on Dec 8, 2008 21:48:56 GMT -5
If I were you I would shoot all of your images at the opera house RAW, if you have proper software (Photoshop, Lightroom) to edit on, that is. With RAW you you'll be able to pull out some of the noise you'll get with a light sensitivity of 1600. Another thing you can try to get rid of the noise is gaussian blurring the blue channel in photoshop. The blue channel tends to be where you get most of the noise.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Dec 8, 2008 22:14:12 GMT -5
indubitably. Always shoot in RAW mode.
|
|
|
Post by Cody Davis on Dec 11, 2008 15:06:43 GMT -5
Thank you guys. This seemed to help me alot actually. I for some reason or the next was using too high of an fstop and was shaking too much. changin my shots to RAW when I shoot them has also seemed to give me an improvement with photoshop.
I will have to post some pics soon!
But thanks for all the help
|
|