|
Post by David on Jul 7, 2009 23:45:37 GMT -5
Amazing. It reminds me so much of classic old films. It wasn't over done at all. Some of the film quality isn't great, but the whole thing was great in my opinion. I really want to see it again.
|
|
|
Post by Josh Talo on Jul 8, 2009 0:27:24 GMT -5
I loved it.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Jul 8, 2009 2:48:03 GMT -5
Great movie. I agree about the quality though. Some parts looked like the could've been shot with a 300 dollar camera.
|
|
|
Post by Matt Radick on Jul 8, 2009 10:15:59 GMT -5
Maybe that was the plan, considering the time period it was set in and the fact that it has an old touch to it. Haven't seen it yet though.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Jul 8, 2009 11:23:00 GMT -5
Naw, it wasn't. It looked very out of place.
|
|
|
Post by David on Jul 8, 2009 11:36:24 GMT -5
Yeah, it looked like they used digital cameras for some parts, which is weird considering the cast, they should have had quite a loan from the studio for production.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon S. Locke on Jul 8, 2009 14:04:20 GMT -5
Was it just me or did it seem like the part where he was getting arrested for the first time looked like actual footage from it for a brief moment?
|
|
|
Post by David on Jul 9, 2009 12:44:46 GMT -5
Yeah, I kinda got hat feeling too. Just for a second, kinda before they were putting him into the car.
|
|
|
Post by Josh Talo on Jul 13, 2009 23:35:33 GMT -5
Also, Marion Cotillard was gorgeous.
|
|